Pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2 before the COVID-19 pandemic era in Cameroon: A comparative analysis according to HIV-status.

Background: The lower burden of COVID-19 in tropical settings may be due to preexisting cross-immunity, which might vary according to geographical locations and potential exposure to other pathogens. We sought to assess the overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and determine SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity according to HIV-status before the COVID-19 pandemic era. Methods: A cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted at the Chantal BIYA International Reference Centre (CIRCB) on 288 stored plasma samples (163 HIV-positive versus 125 HIV-negative); all collected in 2017-2018, before the COVID-19 pandemic era. Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM assay was used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and M (IgM). Among people living with HIV (PLHIV), HIV-1 viral load and TCD4 cell count (LTCD4) were measured using Abbott Real Time PCR and BD FACSCalibur respectively. Statistical analyses were performed, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The median [IQR] age was 25 [15-38] years. Overall seropositivity to SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 13.5% (39/288) of which 7.3% (21) was IgG, 7.3% (21) IgM and 1.0% (3) IgG/IgM. According to HIV-status in the study population, SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was 11.0% (18/163) among HIV-positive versus 16.8% (21/125) among HIV-negative respectively, p=0.21. Specifically, IgG was 6.1% (10/163) versus 8.8% (11/125), p=0.26; IgM was 5.5% (9/163) versus 9.6%, (12/125), p=0.13 and IgG/IgM was 0.6% (1/163) versus 1.6% (2/125) respectively. Among PLHIV, SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity according to CD4 count was 9.2% (≥500 cells/µL) versus 1.8% (200-499 cells/µL), (OR=3.5; p=0.04) and 0.6% (<200 cells/µL), (OR=17.7; p<0.01). According to viral load, SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was 6.7% (≥40 copies/mL) versus 4.9% (<40 copies/mL), (OR= 3.8; p<0.01). Conclusion: Before COVID-19 in Cameroon, cross-reactive antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were in circulation, indicating COVID-19 preexisting immunity. This preexisting immunity may contribute in attenuating disease severity in tropical settings like Cameroon. Of relevance, COVID-19 preexisting immunity is lower with HIV-infection, specifically with viral replication and poor CD4-cell count. As poor CD4-count leads to lower cross-reactive antibodies (regardless of viral load), people living with HIV appear more vulnerable to COVID-19 and should be prioritized for vaccination.

Evaluation of archived drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 DNA among vertically infected adolescents under antiretroviral treatment in Cameroon: Findings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: With the success of antiretroviral therapy (ART), children born with HIV are more likely to reach adolescence. However, frequent non-adherence to ART in adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) leads to viral replication. Notably, a viraemic infection might lead to archived drug resistance mutations (ADRMs). Hence, within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to compare the patterns of ADRMs in viraemic and non-viraemic vertically infected ALHIV and to assess their immunity to and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted among COVID-19-unvaccinated ALHIV receiving ART in Yaoundé-Cameroon over the period October 2021 to March 2022. Plasma HIV-RNA was measured using Abbott® m2000rt; HIV-1 genotyping was performed on buffy-coat (HIV-1 DNA) and ADRMs were interpreted using HIVdb.v9.0.1. Patterns of HIV-1 ADRMs were compared between viraemic (≥ 1.60 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml) and non-viraemic (< 1.60 log10 copies/ml) individuals. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed on whole blood using Abbott Panbio COVID-19 immunoglobulin G/M (IgG/IgM) rapid test and COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test was performed using nasopharyngeal swab samples. RESULTS: Of the 60 ALHIV [aged 17 (16-19) years, 51.6% female], median ART duration was 14 (12-16) years; 31/55 (56.3%) were exposed to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based first-line ART (of whom 19/31 transitioned to dolutegravir-based ART in 2020) and 24/55 (43.6%) were on second-line ART. Forty-two out of 60 (70.0%) ALHIV were non-viraemic; 43/60 (71.6%) were successfully sequenced. Overall the ADRM rate was 62.7% (27/43), with 69.2% (9/13) viraemic and 60.0% (18/30) non-viraemic (p = 0.56). NNRTI-ADRMs were significantly higher among viraemic ALHIV (69.2% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.030). Regarding immunity, those with CD4 nadir < 350 cells/µl had significantly higher rates of ADRMs [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.20 (1.36-95.53), p = 0.03]. In relation to COVID-19 immunity, overall SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity was 28.3% (17/60), whereas 0% (0/60) were seropositive to IgM; in particular, those with CD4 count nadir ≥ 350 cells/µl had higher odds of SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity [OR =7.85 (2.03-30.28), p < 0.01]. No significant association was found between SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity and HIV-RNA (non-viraemic, 33.3%; viraemic, 16.7%; p = 0.18). SARS-CoV-2 RNA prevalence was 4.5% (2/44). The two positive participants were with low-levels of viral load (Ct > 30) and seropositive to IgG. CONCLUSION: In the context of virological success, the majority of ALHIV harbour ADRMs, essentially driven by NNRTI mutations and low CD4 nadir. During the current pandemic, about one-third of ALHIV were previously exposed to SARS-CoV-2. However, some children might have been exposed and uninfected and others might have been infected but showed no serological response at sampling. These findings support the use of NNRTI-sparing regimens and the implementation of COVID-19 barrier measures targeting ALHIV during such a pandemic.

High concordance in SARSCoV-2 detection between automated (Abbott m2000) and manual (DaAn gene) RT-PCR systems: The EDCTP PERFECT-Study in Cameroon.

Molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 is critical to the control of the pandemic, which is a major threat to global health. Several molecular tests have been validated by WHO, but would require operational evaluation in the field to ensure their interoperability in diagnosis. In order to ensure field interoperability in molecular assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, we evaluated the diagnostic concordance of SARS-CoV-2 between an automated (Abbott) and a manual (DaAn gene) realtime PCR (rRT-PCR), two commonly used assays in Africa. A comparative study was conducted on 287 nasopharyngeal specimens at the Chantal BIYA International Reference Centre (CIRCB) in Yaounde- Cameroon. Samples were tested in parallel with Abbott and DaAn gene rRT-PCR, and performance characteristics were evaluated by Cohen's coefficient and Spearman's correlation. A total of 273 participants [median age (IQR) 36 (26-46) years] and 14 EQA specimens were included in the study. Positivity was on 30.0% (86/287) Abbott and 37.6% (108/287) DaAn gene. Overall agreement was 82.6% (237/287), with k=0.82 (95%CI: 0.777-0.863), indicating an excellent diagnostic agreement. The positive and negative agreement was 66.67% (72/108) and 92.18 % (165/179) respectively. Regarding Viral Load (VL), positive agreement was 100% for samples with high VLs (CT<20). Among positive SARS-CoV- 2 cases, the mean difference in Cycle Threshold (CT) for the manual and Cycle Number (CN) for the automated was 6.75±0.3. The excellent agreement (>80%) between the Abbott and DaAn gene rRTPCR platforms supports interoperability between the two assays. Discordance occurs at low-VL, thus underscoring these tools as efficient weapons in limiting SARS-CoV-2 community transmission.